Downlaod java 8 update 171 install#

The result being that if yum is used to install 8u171 it will remove 8u161

Downlaod java 8 update 171 update#

Jdk-8u171-linux-ењ†4.rpm installing into /usr/java/jdk1.8.0_171-amd64, and being marked as an update on 161. jdk8u151 broke/stopped this convention that allows multiple jdk versions on a system (due to a rename of the rpm package to 'jdk1.8')ДЄbility to have more that one JDK install available on a system, via the RPM packing install distribution You can as the are separately named rpms.

Downlaod java 8 update 171 upgrade#

171 is marked as an upgrade of 161, and as a result the yum package manager removes 8u161ДЄttempt to install jdk-8u141-linux-ењ†4.rpm, jdk-8u144-linux-ењ†4.rpm, jdk-8u131-linux-ењ†4.rpm on the same system. STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :ДЄttempt to install jdk-8u171-linux-ењ†4.rpm and jdk-8u161-linux-ењ†4.rpm on the same system, using yum. REGRESSION : Last worked in version 8u171 Is it not possible to go back to the name convention of having the version number in the RPM package name like that of 144, 141, 131 etc. It is not possible to install 2 versions of the same named rpm on a system using the yum package manager

Installation directory names were changed as a fix for JDK-8191608.ДЄs the reporter mentions (on JDK-8202320) this breaks a large amount of conventions (based on the all the previous jdk installs over time), by adding the '-amd64' chipset reference in the directory name.ДЄdditionally this fix does not allow side by side installs of 151, 161 and 171, as the rpm package name is the same. is reporting that this was a conscious decision to add -amd64 in the directory name to allow side by side installs of the rpms: This is directly related to the previous bug reports that are being closed: This should be installing into the '/usr/java/jdk1.8.0_171' directory.

The rpm jdk-8u171-linux-ењ†4.rpm is installing into the /usr/java/jdk1.8.0_171-amd64 directory.